Totle: Casino-Friend.com

Middleboro Mashpee Wampanoag Resort Casino

 

Letters to the Editor

page 6

page 5 here

 

Editor's Note: We are starting to receive letters that are not only repetitious, but verge on libel towards town officials. They also present unsubstantiated data to back their allegations. A few are published below but no more will be. Only letters that are civil and will be published. Letters with statistics must be backed with academic documentation not speculation. Furthermore, letters that are sarcastic will not be published. As a basic guideline, we adhere to the same standards as a print newspaper. Please check your spelling, punctuation and grammar before sending your letter. (It takes me enought time to correct my own.)


8/15/07

I have four questions. Did the town of Lakeville consider the traffic which would be going through Middleboro when they agreed to have a Target store built in their town? Did Raynham consider the traffic that would be coming down Rt.44 when they got their auto mile? How much of the tax dollars going to these towns is going to come to Middleboro? Why should any town around Middleboro expect any money from the casino deal when none of these towns wanted it in their town.

Donna Groves


8/9/07

Be careful what you wish for.

Individuals that are with the "Anti-Casino" group have suggested that Mr Bond be "-- -- -- -- --
(vicious suggstions removed by editor no need to repeat them here ) --- --- . They have struck personal insults at my wife. "

The " anti-casino people" say they are worried that the casino will bring in crime. I would like to
remind them that they need to clean up their own housebefore making such comments.

Mr Bond and his family should not have been threatened. This is a CRIMINAL ACT. Name calling is
for the simple minded. Hoping that Mr Bond is attacked and killed is beneath any standards that
would be considered civil.

A child would receive severe punishment or perhaps be suspended from school if he/she threatened a
student, teacher or administrator and used this kind of sick and violent language in any schools in our
community.

As far as I am concerned this is a spineless TERRORIST ATTACK on Mr. Bond and his family. Anti-casino
groups should obey the laws and not use terrorist tactics.

John Ferguson


8/8/07

This letter, which was about Adam Bond's OpEd, was removed at the author's request. The allegation was made that Casino-Friend was playing the "race card" and knows full well that opponents of the casino are not racists. I am leaving my response to that on.

RESPONSE:

How many times and in how many ways do I have to state that I have never said members of the organized casino oposition were racists? The challenge is simple: go over the Casino-Friend archives and find one example of this.

This is what I wrote on July 31:

Once and for all: this web site is not accusing anyone at CasinoFacts of being a racist.

by Hal Brown

7/31/07 Read the editorial, CERA rears its ugly head (here). A member of the most well-known anti-Indian sovereignty group, Carol Kelly has made it her business to involve herself in trying to stop the casino. Check the letters to the editor this week. The vice president of a similar group in New York has also weighed in. All we ever asked was for CasinoFacts to formally issue a statement repudiating the anti-Indian rights goals of these groups. Note that CERA and similar groups are considered by Native Americans to be racist and similar to the Klan.

Why haven't they done this? It seems to have been a straight forward request. Just because it came from this web site doesn't mean it should be ignored. A disavowal of any connection whatsoever with Carol Kelly or members of CERA or similar groups is not, as Mark Bellanger says, my asking him to respond to outlandish claims since I made no claims at all.

Carol Kelly's letter to The Enterprise and the letter to the editor to this web site from Scott E. Peterman weren't solicited at the last minute in an attempt to ratchet up the rhetoric.

Read the links. Decide for yourself what these groups are all about. Ask yourself if we want them involved in our town business whether you are for or against the casino.

These groups could very well involve themselves in the next stage of fighting the casino with legal challenges. If members of CasinoFacts decide to continue this fight, as is their right, they need to seriously think about the morality and wisdom of an alliance, formal or informal, with anti-Indian rights groups.

The editors of this web site do not question the sincerity and passion of those we've encountered locally who oppose the casino because they are genuinely concerned about crime, the morality of gambling as a revenue source, gambling addiction, losing the rural character of the town and similar issues.

We just want those who read Casino-Friend who may be associated with CasinoFacts, and others who are trying to keep apprised of what both sides are communicating online, that outsiders with very different motivations may be trying to intrude on what should be a purely Middleboro issue.

 

There were a few instances of crude racial epithets being used against pro-casino demonstrators but no suggestion was ever made these were anything but isolated incidents and these people were anything but a part of a small minority.

What I have asked was for CasinoFacts.org to disavow any formal or informal association with a member of CERA, Carol Kelly, and repudiate the message of CERA and other anti-Indian sovereignty groups. They have never responded to this. Instead the notion that I and others are playing the so-called race card is used. This is is a CERA tactic used to put critics on the defensive when they call their so-called "equality" message hidden racism. The idea is that when people call you racist, you accuse them of playing the race card.

Members of CERA go out of their way to demonstrate that they are not racist, including finding Native Americans to join their cause, but all this is an attempt to undermine critics.


8/8/07

Responding to an individual's comments in a letter to the editor of the Enterprise, I believe, that he was not permitted to speak at the town meeting, it seems to me that the Moderator set the ground rules firmly at the beginning of the meeting that repetitious comments or argument positions would not be entertained. Obviously, individuals such as the one cited here simply wanted to put a "two cents" into the debate, but he failed to recognize that the VOTERS were not interested in a prolonged debate- re-hashing the same old arguments- and rightly so, the Moderator employed his duly appointed power to restrict such a thing. "Sour Grapes" is an adequate description for those individuals. What is needed now is an oversight committee to work with the tribe and our town officials to ensure that the priorities of the Town will be reflected in the overall development of the project. If the opponents place their energies toward this end, then their concerns can certainly be addr essed. And everyone wins!

This whole phenomenon erupted very quickly, and those complaining that there was insufficient time to reflect and analyze this have a somewhat valid point- however, sometimes opportunities emerge rather suddenly, and there might not be sufficient time for extensive reflection and analysis due to circumstances. There IS plenty of time to establish an oversight committee as suggested above and to reflect on and analyze the development of this business-if circumstances are such that the proposal can proceeed as planned.

Enough demonizing and moralizing. Haven't these intelligent individuals ever heard of the Volstead Act of the 20's? The lesson learned there is that morality can't be legislated. If people want to gamble and develop pathological addictions, they will do it. If not at the Wampanoag Resort-Casino, then somewhere else. Anyway, people don't recognize that the vast majority of patrons will not be locals, and data from the Connecticut resort-casinos seems to indicate that the addiction problems occur to a small minority of their patrons. So I question whether that ground for opposition is really a valid point applied to this community.

Adam Bond articulated the situation very well in his OpEd, responding to the lengths to which some of his critics went in their negative criticisms. Just where were these people when these issues came up? (or do they still think that Adam, et.al. were deliberating in a closed-door back-room locale?)

Joe Yeskewicz


8/6/07

How about bringing the community back together and come up with some ideas on how to balance a budget or preserve the historical sites that we have. Don’t hate me because my opinion is different than yours, we all have our own personal reason for why we voted one way or the other. Let’s put our differences aside and become neighbors again and work together!

--
Best regards,

Wally Glendy


8/2/07

I certainly don't have all the answers and I appreciate open minded people who are capable of listening and reasoning with intelligent discourse. I'm not so much a worst case scenario person as a human being truly saddened by the lack of concern for those who could suffer the brunt of the social ills that could happen with a Casino in Middleboro or the area. The context I'll use is our motto for education, "No child left behind", we could argue numbers all day long and only God knows the true impact, however what must be said is that if one child is hurt or dies from compulsive gambling or a traffic accident, that is far too great a price to pay!

What we ought to be able to agree on is that far too many families and their children will be put at risk, even if we get to use the best scenario of $11,000,000.00 a year for improvements to the town. Think about this, if any family in the area had even one child lost out in the woods, we'd all drop what we were doing and would be out there with flashlights all night long and for as many days as it would take to find them. Please think for just a couple minutes of the impact to any family of not finding that child alive for what ever reason, you must admit it would be devastating. I had a baby sister die of meningitis while growing up here in town, she was originally diagnosed with the mumps and by the time an ambulance got her to Children's Hospital it was too late.

Good intentions and hopes and prayers don't keep bad things from happening to good people, I hope you'll open your heart to possibly reconsider your position. I've come to the conclusion the only good Casino is the one that never opens, and I plan to work diligently to that end. If Middleboro has a soul it's our children, our greatest asset is our future as well, I've decided as have many other people that putting even one of them at risk would be wrong!

This is a very scant, abbreviated look at my position on this matter, I would welcome further insight and dialogue from the staunchest Pro-Casino people, we have to learn to co-exist in this town and world together.

Best Regards,

Bob Kinney

RESPONSE

Your arguments about social costs, that is the harm of gambling addiction to individuals and families, is an almost unassailable argument against a casino located anywhere. Residents of some towns, perhaps New Bedford as an example, would readily trade these negative impacts for the rejuvenation of its downtown and the economic boost of a share of the revenue. Middleboro is more complex because while it has been struggling economically it isn't a town suffering from urban blight. It isn't even a small town like the towns out west which became ghost towns when highway interchanges passed them by. Middleboro almost ready for life economic support, which is sorely in need of an economic transfusion.

Putting your argument in the terms of a trade-off between jobs and money and the loss of one child who is hurt or dies, or any person for that matter so harmed, puts the decision we made in bold relief. A child, a teenager, a young mother, a father, a grandparent... what difference does it make? The soul of a community is collective and notably includes its most vulnerable, its innocents, who need adults with wisdom and good judgment to protect them. But it includes all good people.

But here's where the debate becomes almost too philosophical. Welcoming a casino involves the trade-offs decision makers often have to make about what is the greater good and reminds me of parables like Sophie's Choice. Presidents make such decisions, town selectmen makes them, and voters make them.

People are already being hurt because families suffer when parents can't find jobs, when schools are losing teachers, and so on. These are arugments we all heard not only during the casino debate, but prior to the Proposition 2 1/2 override vote. Revenue from the casino can lessen, if not eliminate these problems.

Consider the lost child in the woods because Middleboro has tens of thousands of acres of woods and wetlands. No doubt scores, if not hundreds of volunteers would rally to look for the child. But the first on the scene would be local law enforcement, police and fire fighters from Middleboro and adjacent towns including the tirbal police and fire departments would be the first to arrive. The agreement with the tribe will assure more public safety personnel.

Consider just for one similar example, a house on fire where minutes count. Having fully manned fire stations could save that one child's life, or an entire family's life.

It's not simple. I wish it was. But your arguments are stated clearly and I must say that they were just about the most diffiult to respond to.

P.S. Your point about a traffic accident caused by the casino being here is somewhat of a different kind of argument. While there will be an increase in town traffic, and traffic on 495 and 44, there will also be road improvement. Just getting rid of the lights on the intersections of 44 will probably save lives.


7/30/07

Those in favor of having an Indian casino in their community have no idea what they are asking for. I live within 10 miles of the Oneida Indian tribe's Turning Stone Casino. They cannibalize the surrounding businesses. They refuse to collect sales tax from nonmember customers as demanded by law, and refuse to pay property taxes. They are now trying to have 17,000 acres of land (in properties dispersed all over Madison and Oneida Counties) taken into federal trust so they can continue to evade all taxes and flout all laws. The only people prospering is the tribe. Oneida County (the county in which the casino is located) had a 10% sales tax. It is now down to 9.75% and is the highest in the state.

People around the country are trying to stop Indian casinos from coming to their communities. Just north of Buffalo, New York, the Senecas have a casino in Niagara. They are now trying to start another one in downtown Buffalo. Citizens, state reps, and a few retired federal reps are suing to stop them. You had better get educated fast. I suggest you take a long look at www.upstate-citizens.org. I am the vice president of this grassroots citizen group, and we have been fighting Indian land claims, an illegal casino compact, federal Indian law, and now land-into-trust. We successfully sued Governor Pataki in the case Peterman v. Pataki and proved that the gaming compact for the Turning Stone was invalid because it lacked legislative approval. The Oneidas filed for cert. at the U.S. Supreme Court level and the Court refused to hear the case. It has been over a year now and the illegal casino is still open and operating Class III gambling in complete violation of state and federal laws. None of our so-called elected representative, including Governor Spitzer will even think about enforcing the law.

Casinos aren't economic engines. They create NO wealth. They simply shift the wealth around from the hands of the many to the hands of the few. All reputable studies on casino gambling demonstrate that they are a losing proposition. You would be better off getting Toyota to open a factory in your area. I also suggest that you log onto the www.pechanga.net and take a long look at the mess in California. They have 106 Indian tribes and all of them want a casino near a metropolitan area.

Best of luck to you all,

Scott E. Peterman

RESPONSE:

I completely disagree with your assessment of the lack of financial benefits which you describe. I am familiar with your group. Like CERA, another group with equal in its name, it is one of several so-called grass roots organizations with the same anti-sovereignty goal. This is what Bruce Johnson had to say about United Citizens for Equality in The New Terminators: A Guide to the Anti-Sovereignty Movement in 2000.

The Upstate Citizens for Equality is comprised largely of property holders who believe that some or all of what they own may become part of several land claims being pursued by the original five nations of the Iroquois Confederacy, the Mohawk, Seneca, Cayuga, Ononodaga, and Oneida. An Internet home page maintained by the UCE leads with a question: "People are facing eviction from their homes for expansion of Indian reservations. Are you next?" (Upstate Citizens).

UCE characterizes itself as "a citizen organization that is working to fight Indian land claims in Central New York and change the course of Federal Indian policy." UCE has opened chapters in Oneida, Madison, Seneca, Cayuga and Niagara counties, and claims a state-wide membership of more than 8,200.

The UCE chapter in Madison County, New York, specializes in street theater, especially outside the Oneida's Turning Stone casino. A UCE "border patrol" marks the boundary of the Oneida Nation with yellow "caution" tape, telling patrons that they leave their rights under the U.S. Constitution at the border. Colorfully-dressed "border guards" stand at attention as lines of picketers mill around them. Protesters rally around mock "Patriot" missiles; signs carry the name of Ray Halbritter, the Oneida Nation representative.

The John Birch Society put Halbritter's face on the cover of its New American magazine, calling him "High-Rollin', Land-Grabbin' Ray." A sign along Route 46 displayed a rifle and the words: "Ray, come and get your rent." The mock missile making the rounds near Verona bore the inscription, "Heads up, Ray."

The specific concern of UCE in Madison County (and the reason its members spend so much time picketing the Turning Stone) is the use, by the Oneidas, of casino profits to buy land that was once part of their traditional estate. Before the casino opened, Oneida land holdings had been reduced to about 30 acres.

A UCE web page appeals to class biases as it recruits: "Instead of going to the Turning Stone for entertainment, why not join the UCE picketers? You'll meet a much better class of people at UCE than at the Turning Stone!!" One day on the picket lines, brags the web page, "Ten cars turned around and left after reading a picket sign that said `No health inspectors. Enjoy your meal'." (Upstate Citizens)

For almost three weeks during the summer of 1999, Oneida radio station WMCR canceled its daily call-in show, "Open Line" due to remarks made in poor taste on land-claims issues. The show resumed September 17, "with a vow by management to maintain civility." (Seely) At one point in the radio free-for-all, Susan Galbraith, former DeRuyter [New York] town supervisor who often speaks on behalf of UCE, called the Oneida government "parasitic." Later she recanted that comment, revising her opinion of the Oneida government to "shakedown artists and schoolyard bullies." (Seely)

I believe all the citizens of Middleboro will soundly reject involvement by groups such as yours in our affairs.


Published at the author's request:

Dear Middleborough Board of Selectmen;

I am making a formal request that Mr. Perkins publicly withdraw his statement that was published in the Enterprise on July 30, 2007 in the article titled "Middleboro begins cleaning up loose ends", written by Alice C. Elwell, Enterprise correspondent. The statement is as follows:

"Perkins said residents have until today to get the signs out of their yards or they'll risk incurring a zoning violation."

I called the Middleborough Police Dept. and I was told that his statement is not valid. If the police dept. is incorrect, please advise me and the Middleborough Police so we know the zoning law to which he is referring. If no zoning law exists, then I am requesting that his withdrawal be in the Enterprise, and in any other media to which he has made this statement.

Sincerely,
Ann Thomassen

RESPONSE:

Your letter was read at the Selectman's Meeting by Wayne Perkins who explained that what he said to The Enterpise reporters was misquoted. He said that it has been past practice after elections for people to remove lawn signs within 48 hours. He said he would ask the newspaper to print a correction and appologized to anyone effected by this error.


7/30/07

At 4:00 today a silver sedan with a casino-friends bumper sticker stopped at my house, came onto private property and stole my sign. This was right after I had taken my 3 children in the house from the car. My sign has been run over twice in the middle of the day and now finally stolen. Please tell me how I explain this to my children? Should I just simply say that those that want the casino in this town are a bunch of crooks?


Annemarie Jacobson

RESPONSE:

See what I wrote to Don Gendon below.


7/30/07

Dear Mr. Brown,

It is sad that the course of Middleboro has been decided by 3,722 out of almost 20,000. It's also regretable to think of all the time and money both sides invested in their beliefs about the casino when you think of what you all could have accomplished for the schools and services with that money and effort. With that said I believe everyone who took up the cause did so for their love of their town. One side will eventually be proved right let's just hope that it's the side that won this battle.

Regards,

Trav Charron

RESPONSE:

There are around 14,000 registered voters in Middleboro. I agree with your last statement.


7/30/07

They stole my yes signs fri. night. but they couldn't steal my yes vote on Sat.

Don Gendron

RESPONSE:

Unfortunately there have been similar reports all along from both sides.


 

 

Previous letters to the editor >>>