Middleboro Mashpee Wampanoag Resort Casino

Editorial

The Enterprise: Splashy coverage but it isn't balanced journalism.
The Boston Globe should be embarrassed about the coverage in Globe South too.

 6/17/07 The Sunday Enterprise has a rare splashy single topic* front page and four articles about the Mashpee Wampanoag casino proposed for Middleboro. We suggest you read them and see for yourself whether their reporting is fair and balanced. While statements from casino advocates are in the print edition, there are other examples of bias in addition to their "news" articles. For example they have two photographs of residents holding pro and anti-casino signs inside, the anti-sign holder's picture is twice as large.    (Click here to see for yourself.) 

The media, and The Enterprise in particular with reporters Alice Elwell and Mike Underwood, are focusing on negative aspects of the casino coming to Middleboro in their articles. The Enterprise has made its editorial position clear, but they should not let an editorial bias leak into their news reporting. As far as we can tell, while there have been photos of residents holding Casino-Friend signs, to date there has been no mention that there are two websites devoted to the casino issue in actual articles.

It isn't just The Enterprise. The Boston Globe has a correspondent, Christine Wallgren, who is covering the story for the Globe South edition.

In the two most recent articles about the controversy in Globe South, correspondent Christine Wallgren referenced the opposition website a number of times without ever indicating there was a website providing a counterpoint. These articles have clickable links which take the reader to the CasinoFacts website. The Globe South article today has four such links. These links in a high readership website both increase the search engine rankings of CasinoFacts and lead readers to a one-sided website.

In a May 31st article she wrote and this is the only reference to our website in it:

Casino supporters Helen Belmont**, Hal Brown, and Joseph Freitas have set up a pro casino website at casino-friend.com to, they say, balance the casino opponents' site at casinofacts.org. "We think we look at it more objectively," Brown said. "We address the negatives. We have no affiliation with the tribe or funds from the tribe."

Prior to that, on May 27th, Ms. Wallgren wrote an article where she devoted one paragraph to this website and eight to the anti-casino website and their spokespeople. When I complained to her about her coverage this is what she wrote me today:

I wrote a story about your group and casinofacts reacted the same way you are. I guess if both sides say, I'm biased, then I'm not.

This sounds reasonable at first blush, but ask yourself just how logical a statement it is. If both your children come in after a tussle with each other and one has black and blues all over themselves and the other is unruffled, and they each complain that the other started the fight, do you simply accept that both are in the wrong?

Casino-Friend has had enough of biased reporting and since there's nobody to do it for us, we are defending ourselves.

And as far as separating personal opinion from their reporting, I have to wonder if these reporters ever took even one undergraduate journalism course?

The local media could learn a lesson from one of the top public television stations in the country, Boston's WGBH (channels 2 and 44). They are planning to have representatives from both CasinoFacts and Casino-Friend on their popular local news show, Greater Boston, Monday night.

We believe casino supporters significantly outnumber the vocal and highly visible opposition.  There are indications, as evidenced by a few homemade law signs springing up around town (right, signs on Center Street), that the silent majority is beginning to make their position known.

*All but one story about the casino.
** Helen is now working on her own to rally support for the casino, which is a time and energy consuming endeavor. Kathy Ryan has taken her place on the steering committee.

 

 

This site and its steering committee has no affiliation with the Mashpee Wampanoag or their representatives.
 See financial and donation statement

/

HOME