Casino Friend focuses on the
Middleboro Mashpee Wampanoag Resort Casino
 and features news and opinion plus a forthright discussion about the pro and cons of a Middleboro Casino.
Hal Brown, Editor and Publisher; Joe Freitas, Associate Editor

Problem gambling and My view of casino facts || Letters to the Editor Updated 8:00 AM on July 29th || Search Google News for casino articles ||Who we are and financial Donations to the site are closed Thank you.||\ Resources || Email logo


 

 

Quote of the month:

$20 million is the price to trump moral scruples

"The bottom line: This agreement provides less than half of the money we need. The only acceptable deal would include a percentage of the gross slot revenue. The going rate for selling an idyllic small town is north of $20 million dollars." Mark Belanger

Reminds me of the punchline of the world's oldest "dirty" joke. "I've already established what you are, now we're just dickering over price."


Selectman vote to approve agreement

2/24/07 Last night the Middleboro Board of Selectman, voted unanimously to approve the contract with the Mashpee Wampanoag after a power point presentation by Adam Bond, remarks by Wayne Perkins and questions from audience members.

The meeting was held at the high school auditorium to accommodate larger than normal crowds, but many more seats were empty than occupied.

Adam Bond's presentation was highlighted by the presentation of a decision matrix which graphically showed that whether or not the tribe built a casino here a no vote resulted in either a lose-lose result or a single lose for the town.

A primary spokesperson against the casino, Mark Belanger, asked the most pointed question, whether any tribe had succeeded in opening a casino after a town voted against it.

One of the main claims the anti-casino group is making attempts to counter the pro-casino argument that if the town votes the agreement down there is a serious risk the casino will be built anyway and Middleboro will get nothing. Attorney Dennis Whittlesey answered that one would have to go back some time to tribes in Oregon and Washington to look at instances where there were legal battles to stop tribes against tribes.

He noted the expense of such litigation on both sides. He said that anti-Indian rights groups such as Citizens Equal Rights Alliance (CERA) had been involved in the legal fights. These organizations are national in scope and attempt to thwart the attempts of tribes to gain and benefit from sovereignty all across the United States and Canada. (See reference for more information.)

Adam Bond said that his impression having been closely involved with the tribe it that they definitely plan to come to Middleboro.

Pictures.


For undecided's, a week to weigh the pros and cons

7/22/07 Expect both sides to make their case for and against a casino in a big way this week. Each side may claim the other is issuing propaganda. It is up to undecided voters to compare what each side has to say. To get an objective analysis, turn to the casino impact study group's report. Read hopefully unbiased sources such as some of the newspapers which finally seem to be devoting the time and energy to covering the substantive (read, less sensational) aspects of the debate.

This website has never said that locating a huge destination resort - casino in Middleboro wouldn't change the town, or cause a number of problems. Some, probably most, can be addressed, mitigated, or solved. Others, should the casino come, people will have to learn to live with.

Those who haven't made up their mind must balance the benefits of having a partnership with the Mashpee Wampanog in a casino (see outline of agreement at right) with the impacts they personally identify as negative. Obviously what is a negative impact to one is not a negative impact to another.

I trust that undecided's will put aside feelings about personalities, and the tactics or behaviors of a few people on each side, and make their decision dispassionately.

I also hope that those in a quandary about which way to vote do not fall prey to a common human failing of not appreciating their own uniqueness - in this case the uniqueness of the townspeople of Middleboro. I believe that we have proved during the past months how resourceful and creative we are. This goes for those active on both side.

As if residents don't occupy a unique enough position in that they will be voting on something that will impact the town for decades, they also have another very unusual opportunity. Those who don't trust the Board of Selectmen to adroitly handle the revenue a casino deal will bring will have the chance to replace a majority of the Board of Selectmen in September.

If the resort -casino comes to Middleboro there are many people who have never been actively involved in town affairs until now who can and should offer their talents, time and energy to assure that the partnership with the Mashpee Wampanoag is an unprecedented success.

(by Hal Brown, Editor)

Click here to follow the most recent newspapers articles about the casino


7/22/07 CasinoFacts.org has issued a press release about a forum that they will be holding on July 25th, available here. They are encouraging all concerned citizens in Middleboro and surrounding communities – as well as the press – to attend.


 

 

What's this about giving away 68% of a casino's hotel rooms to big spenders thus avoiding paying Middleoro its promised room tax?

by Joe Freitas and Hal Brown

7/25/07 Richard Young brought this up at the Selectman's Meeting to challenge the figure of $4 million derived from a room tax. He wouldn't tell where he got the number. Now it is clear why. The figure is based on Atlantic City (Reference). As it happens, New Jersey charges room tax on complimentary hotel rooms, or "comp rooms". (Reference) Massachusetts has a similar law requiring tax be paid on comp rooms (Reference). However, tribal enterprises aren't taxed.

Since the tribe estimated they would pay us a "tax" on rooms and “conservatively estimated” it to be $4 million in their joint press release, one would assume this means they would pay us the tax on all rooms, and keep their comp levels low. The Atlantic City frenzied competition in a very small area does not exist in the current market in Middleborough, so it is distinguishable on that ground, and no other markets with this comp level have been identified. Before throwing out last minute allegations to embarrass the Selectmen and tarnish the reputation of the tribe, it would behoove the anti-casino forces to stop mutilating the facts to support their cause.

As the day of the vote approaches and there is less time to rebuttals lies and distortions, expect more outlandish false claims.

You can see some of these, and our rebuttals, on the Letters to the Editor page.

Draft agreement between Middleboro and the Mashpee Wampanoag

This is a link to the Town website. It is a long pdf file and depending on the speed of your connection may take a few minutes to open.

 

Tribe and town negotiation roller coaster ride ends with agreement

7/20/07 (Updated 3:45 PM) This is the press release from the Mashpee Wampanoag:

Intergovernmental Agreement reached between Town of Middleborough and Mashpee Wampanoag tribe

$250 million in infrastructure and $11 million annual payment

Middleborough: Today, the town of Middleborough and the Mashpee Wampanoag Nation announced, subject to authorization by the Town and the Mashpee Tribal Council, an “Intergovernmental Agreement”, which will bring a destination resort casino to the town.

The agreement, which is the richest ever reached between a tribe and a host community, provides for $250 million in infrastructure to support the destination resort casino proposed by the Mashpee. It also provides for an annual payment to the town of no less than $11 million.

"Rather than negotiating a lifeless contract, we have formed a long lasting living document", said Selectman Adam Bond.

"Through this agreement we have made good our commitment to offset the impacts of the destination resort, but we have also shown our commitment to the financial security of the Town of Middleborough", said Glenn Marshall, Mashpee Tribal Council Chairman.

The agreement includes:

$172 million in transportation upgrades

$13 million in Electric upgrades

$12.4 million in Natural Gas upgrades

$22.5 million in Water upgrades

$26.3 million in Sewer and Wastewater upgrades

$7 million annual base payment to the town, with an annual increase of 3.1% or the increase in the CPI, whichever is higher

4% lodging tax, collected by the tribe and given to the town, estimated in the first year to be $4 million.

In addition, the tribe will purchase 2 police cruisers and 2 advanced life support ambulances, and the hiring and training costs of 8 police officers and 16 firefighters, at a cost of more than $2 million.

 

In addition to the above, Scott Ferson speaking for the tribe, added that there will be an annual $250,000 payment to the town for planning until the resort - casino opens. Also prior to its opening there will be an initial payment of $40,000 to a local organization (yet to be named) to address compulsive gambling, and $20,000 thereafter.

In addition to the earlier promise to give preference to hiring (after tribe members) to Middleboro residents, there will be preference given to local vendors.

The payment listed above of $2 million will allow the now unmanned fire station to be opened.

 

Read the draft Impact Analysis and Mitigation Report of the study committee here.

7/21/07 Bullet point synopsis of the analysis by Tony Lawrence.

7/20/07 Crime and quality of life have been major concerns of the anti-casino group and of the impact study committee and if is fair to say also of pro-casino residents. Read an abstract of the report prepared for the Department of Justice, which is cited in the impact and mitigation draft here. The entire report is here: Entire DOJ casino report

7/19/07 This is the first draft of the study completed by citizens selected by the Town Moderator for their expertise in relevant areas, and for their objectivity. It addresses the impact a resort casino is likely to have on Middleboro. It provides cogent answers to virtually all of the concerns and fears of the anti-casino group including crime, traffic, social impacts and the effects on the rural character of Middleboro.

While some of the problems associated with a resort casino which have been pointed by the anti-casino group are given credence, solutions are offered which by and large would mitigate them.

Other dire predictions made by people like Jim Reynolds (see article on far left) about child abuse and violent crime simply are dismissed as not based on any credible evidence.

Ed. note: If you know of someone who is still undecided as to how they will vote on the 28th I suggest you to urge them to read it. This report is NOT propaganda. It is the result of hard work by a group of open-minded people who have the best interests of Middleboro at heart.

 

 

 


Latest news: Tribe approves agreement


Casino Impact Study Committee Report


Editorials

Resort - casino supporters care about people too.

and

A call for CasinoFacts to repudiate bigotry, prejudice and hate and any connection with a national group called by a major Indian magazine "The Ku Klux Klan of Indian country",

7/21/07 These are two important issues: CONTINUED >


7/21/07 - In an OpEd Tony Lawrence responds to CasinoFacts' complaints about the agreement


Will the hotel soar 150 stories?

7/21/07 Editor's commentary:

We ate out last night. I had the cell phone on call forwarding. I got a call from someone who said, I think, he was Bill. He was calling to talk to people who were against the casino.

I wanted to hear his pitch so I said I hadn't really decided and wasn't even sure if I was going to bother going to Town Meeting.

I said I'd just heard about an $11 million dollar deal and asked what he thought of that since it seemed like the town could really use the money.

He said "but do you want a 40 story hotel" and I said well, maybe that wouldn't be so bad if we got a lot of money. Then he said, you know they could build one that was 150 stories.

I expressed surprise and said that I'd heard about a forty story hotel but this was the first I'd heard of a 150 story hotel. He said "oh yes, its their land and they could build a 150 story hotel if they wanted". I said "but that's, like, three times as tall as the Hancock Building".

He repeated with some certainty that indeed they very well might build a 150 story building.

Then I said, well I'm glad you made it clear to me that this is what you're telling people because you happen to be talking to the editor of Casino-Friend and I'll be putting this on the website.

He said abruptly "that's good" and hung up.

I wish I had my statistics when he called. Boston's Hancock Tower is 60 stories, so this would really make our's almost three times as tall, and not just the tallest skyscraper in New England but the tallest in the world!

While the tallest building, Taipei 101 is tallest it has 101 stories, the most stories is the Sears Tower at 110.

Now at 150 stories that would really put us on the map. On a clear day not only could we see Boston, we could probably see New York City. It would be a great place for a revolving restaurant.

On some cloudy days we'd even be above the clouds.

 

Latest news throws validity of Town Meeting vote into question.

7/20/07 Residents of Middleboro and members of the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe who read the Boston Globe may have asked themselves "what else could possibly happen" when they read this:

Secretary of State William F. Galvin expressed concern yesterday about the legitimacy of a planned Middleborough Town Meeting at which as many as 9,000 residents will vote on whether to accept a proposed $1 billion Indian-run casino.

He warned town officials that he would scrutinize details of the extraordinary outdoor gathering.

Boston Globe article: Concerns raised on casino meeting.


NECN Middleboro residents on Indian casino

7/18/07 Against: Jim Reynolds and Jesse Powell; for, Bill Marzelli and Hal Brown: click here:  Middleboro residents on Indian casino

From Jim Reynolds talking about how the casino will bring crime to Middleboro: "prostitution, child abuse, gambling addictions, robberies, all sorts of violent crimes, white collar crimes significantly increase, alcoholism..."

Bill Marzelli's response: "They're putting a crime issue out there to scare the people."

Editors note: Readers, you be the judge. Will the crimes against people actually increase? What evidence is there for this? Or is this a tactic designed to play on people's worst fears and prejudices?

What stereotype he trying to evoke listing prostitution, child abuse, robberies, and all sorts of violent crimes? Does he mean to imply that hard working families who move here to get resort and casino jobs are more likely to commit these crimes just because they may not fit into the social class he wants reflected in Middleboro?

I suggest that it is beyond cynical to suggest that our police chief and his department would endorse having the resort - casino here if they thought it would endanger public safety.

If a casino comes it could bring more help for problem gamblers

7/14/07 An irony of the casino issue is that while a huge casino may increase problem gambling, it could also bring more help for compulsive gamblers who aren't getting it now. Read Boston Globe OpEd "Helping those whom gambling hurts"


Quotable Quotes

7/8/07 "They were putting speed on us, let's put speed on them. Let's get it done." Adam Bond in The Standard Times

from: Casino proposal divides town: Tensions on rise in Middleboro

7/8/07 "I understand there's progress," said Judy Gibbs . But a casino does not fit her definition of what that is. A Neiman Marcus -- she would take. A Bloomingdale's -- that would be fine. But a casino? Front page Boston Globe article

CasinoFacts calls for civility

7/7/07 Mark Belanger of CasinoFacts has responded to the open letter below on his blog. He agrees that the very few who are being rude won't even hear his call for civility. As he states, we too doubt they have any involvement with CasinoFacts.

 

Main page from June 26 to July 3, 2007

Negotiation Update

7/19/07 The tribe and the town will meet again today. They hope to have an agreement ready by tomorrow. According to Scott Ferson, a representative of the tribe, good progress is being made. He says that if it continues, he sees no reason why there cannot be an agreement reached by Friday.

Ferson notes that public focus will be on the financials. The majority of the tribe’s disagreement with the second draft was over issues of sovereignty.

These have been addressed over the past week.

Ferson said that the tribe believes strongly that it wants Middleborough to benefit from, not just live with, a casino, and that most residents will be quite pleased with the agreement.


Editor: As the 28th approaches there's still time to persuade a friend who is against the resort-casino to read and consider the counterpoint on this website.

Negotiation Update

7/13/07 5PM: After negotiations described as "friendly and productive" in the Globe, Scott Ferson, Mashpee Wampanoag spokesperson is quoted: "Both parties agreed to meet early next week, with the hope that an agreement can be reached."

Activities of the pros and the cons

7/13/07 Both sides are gearing up to make their case to the public before Town Meeting. Read more here.

7/12/07 - from the Enterprise: Tribe to meet with Middleboro officials tomorrow on casino on Friday

Tribe rejects town's counter-agreement Read letter from Glenn Marshall. Tribe, calling tone of new agreement "hostile" says he wants to go back to the original agreement.

Tribe accuses CasinoFacts with involvement in protest


Bingham and Tolosko at a Middleboro meeting (click to enlarge)

7/9/07 According to an article in today's Enterprise, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Council claims CasinoFacts.org was responsible for the disruption caused by shunned elder Amelia Bingham at the powwow on Saturday.

From the Enterprise article: Tolosko scoffed at allegations the casino group had anything to do with Bingham's protest. That's just crazy, we had nothing to do with it at all, said Tolosko. The woman is 84. Can't they stick to the issue of a casino? Do I know her? Yes. Do I think she's wonderful? Yes. Her agenda is to make sure the tribe has a voice. My agenda is to make sure the residents have a voice.

But the fact is that Tolosko invited Bingham to the meeting where Chairman Glenn Marshall spoke to town residents, and as pictured stood next to her as she waited to ask her questions. (Continued in next column >>> )


Brown blogs back at Balanger

7/7/07 CasinoFacts member, webmaster and website blogger wrote a rebuttal to the address Wayne Perkins gave at the Selectman's Meeting. Here is my response. You can get the gist of what I am addressing even without referring back to his blog, but if you need to I think I answered just about every one of his criticisms of Mr. Perkins. CONTINUED

Main page from June 26 to July 3, 2007

Chairman Glenn Marshall's letter to residents of Middleboro (7/19/07)

From the Mashpee Wampanoag:

Moving Forward Together

Quotable Quote:
 Adam Bond

7/13/07 It takes a real deeper level of understanding of the Wampanoag and what they've been doing for their history, and more importantly for the recent history to understand why there may have been some offense taken by certain things that may have occurred and that wasn't intentional. On NECN.


 7/12/07 Adam Bond on NECN: ...and they need to start soon. Tick Tock.


Residents being called in phone survey

7/9/08 Casino-Friend has had confirmation from five sources that they were called by what was apparently a professional public polling company asking numerous questions about their opinions regarding a casino. MORE


.

.

.

.

.

.
Bingham and Tolosko at a Middleboro meeting (click to enlarge)

Council member David Pocknet told the Enterprise that they have no respect for what they've done to the tribe. According to the paper he said the shunned members tried to stop federal recognition.

Denying sovereign rights to tribal nations is the primary agenda of the national  organization Citizens' Equal Rights Alliance (CERA). One of their board members, Carol Kelly, from Plymouth, has spoken at two casino related meetings in Middleboro. She has also emailed Jackie Tolosko at least twice.
 

A call for good manners


NECN keeps vigil at Town Hall
NECN
7/13/07 Continuing its superior coverage of the casino issue, NECN (ch.8) was at Town Hall at 6:00AM

 

7/12/07 Editorial:

A marriage counselor's view on the broken communications between "us and them"


7/10/07Casino approval process disputed (Standard Times)


Adam Bond debates Assessor Ted Eayers on NECN's Newsnight with Jim Braude: Middleboro casino debate

7/9/07 In this nearly 12 minute debate Bond and Eayers seemed to agree on more than they disagreed on. Eayers and Bond both said they were in favor if problems could be mitigated and the payout to the town was suitable. Eayers ended by saying that no matter what we do there will be a casino in Middleboro, like it or not. NECN casino debate

Latest news on the Town Meeting

7/9/07 From the selectman's meeting: because neither indoors school venue will be available, the current plan is to hold the Town Meeting outside in the field behind the high school. A committee will be appointed to  deal with the myriad elements necessary to hold this meeting.


Commentaries by Tony Lawrence

7/9/07 -- Tony Lawrence, an Oak Point resident rebuts CasinoFacts' front page arguments against a casino point by point. He offers additional pro-casino counter-point to recent anti-casino contentions.  CONTINUED


Quotable Quote

7/7/07 LET THE Mashpee Wampanoags have their casino. Then the state should kill the lottery.

This Indian tribe is reportedly trying to make a deal with Middleborough, which would rather consider killing trees for barren asphalt and a palace of booze and bamboozlement than approve a tax override to pay for public services.  CONTINUED > Derrick Z. Jackson , Boston Globe OpEd


Addressing Arguments against the Casino

Many, perhaps all, of the arguments made by opponents of a Mashpee Wampanoag resort casino in Middleboro can be classified into two major groups.

One is speculation based on what happened or has been reported by some to be detrimental effects to have happened to communities hosting tribal casinos.

The other is a more generic argument based on the moral and social ramifications of compulsive gambling.

We will endeavor not to be dogmatic, or state statistics as facts when they are really speculation.  We will avoid using anecdotal reports as proofs no matter whose side they support.

We respect those who oppose our viewpoints and we will do our best to respond to their questions and concerns.

Middleboro and the Mashpee Wampanoag doing it right.

Just because other communities have had problems associated with large Native American gambling facilities located nearby doesn't mean this must happen to Middleboro.

Dire predictions, voiced as if they are unavoidable, are predictions and we urge people not to be swayed by worst case scenarios and what has come to be fear mongering. We shouldn't wring our hands in desperation at the mere thought that they will come to pass. Instead we should do our best to assure they don't come to pass.

In order to minimize the negative impact of each of the major concerns we heard expressed at the meeting at the Nichols School and in letters to the editor, our town officials and concerned citizens can and must work closely with tribal representatives to come up with creative, sensible, proactive and ongoing plans and programs.

 Crime

Much has been made of the increase in crime in other communities where casinos have been built. We don't have to reinvent the wheel to come up with ways to fight crime as it is now, or as it may increase because of a resort casino.

The Middleboro Police Department is drastically understaffed as it is. It makes no sense that the Mashpee Wampanoag want to assure Disney World level security on their property and leave the rest of Middleboro under-policed and less safe for the citizens. For one thing, many of their employees, including tribe members, will live in Middleboro.

We are trusting the tribe to act in good faith on their promise to help the Middleboro Police in any way they can. Everyone realizes this will mean increasing funds for law enforcement, including funding police units to deal with specific crimes associated with having a nearby gaming facility.

This is Police Chief Gary Russell's view, from The Providence Journal:

He expects traffic to be the biggest problem a casino causes.

With an expanded staff, help from the Massachusetts State Police barracks in town and a tribal security department, he foresees little disruption to the town's tranquil nature. Reference

Traffic

It's in the best interest of all concerned to assure that traffic flows in and out of the facility smoothly. It is also in everyone's interest to make sure that this traffic doesn't cause traffic problems elsewhere in Middleboro.

For some this will be an unavoidable consequence of having a casino and we fully expect many of these residents to be strongly opposed to a casino. We understand this and sympathize with those who purchased houses on streets that they thought would never have more than residential traffic.

The "fact" is that nobody knows for sure what traffic patterns will be on a specific side street at present. If certain streets do have a significant increase in through traffic there are probably ways to mitigate this.

The rural character of Middleboro

Cranbery bogThanks to large tracts of conservation lands, protected wetland, and thousands of acres in cranberry cultivation, Middleboro will remain one of the most rural suburban towns in eastern Massachusetts. Middleboro has more than 72 square miles, that is more than 46,000 acres. Many of those who are against the casino cite its losing its rural character because 1,000 of those acres are used for a resort - casino complex. However, much of it will be golf course and woodsy buffer. A thousand acres is only about 2% of all the land in Middleboro.

Unlike Carver, Plymouth and other towns with cranberry bogs and undeveloped woodland, Middleboro will be unique in that it will have an economic engine to drive it forward into the 21st century while still remaining suburban rural.

While immediate neighbors of the casino will be effected to varying degrees by a large resort casino, and we do feel for them, the majority of residents won't notice any change that wouldn't come about anyway through population growth and housing development

Even with the new subdivisions built for those who move here to be close to resort and casino jobs, these developed acres of upland, and two acre house lots being carved out of wooded areas along many of our roads, Middleboro will be about as rural as a town can be so close to Boston for decades to come.

Morality

There are many sincere and impassioned people who are against gambling for valid moral reasons. One striking moral dimension is that the people that seem most hurt by compulsive gambling are those in the lower income brackets.

In their collective "wisdom" legislatures around the country have promoted gambling for monetary reasons, whether to get a cut of casino income or to supplement their budget through the lottery which some argue is a stealth tax on the poor.

Those opposed to casino gambling invoke the image of the elderly spending all their Social Security income on slot machines. We suggest that by far most people on limited incomes who gamble at casinos go in with a limit to their spending and leave when they have spent their limit.

This brings us to the Native Americans and the fact that the United States government has given them the right to profit from gambling on their land.

They were offered the opportunity to engage in a lucrative business and from their point of view it would be foolish not to take advantage of it.

Are they beholden to the rest of us not to dangle temptation in front of those with incipient gambling addiction?

Are they to ignore such a lucrative business opportunity and instead engage in less profitable and more risky businesses?

I think from a moral standpoint, their obligation is to work with us to do everything possible to deal with the minority of people whose lives will be disrupted by having a casino close by.

Although some disagree, we believe that our moral obligation to the Mashpee Wampanoag is to provide redress to them for the wrongs done to their ancestors by our ancestors.

 

 The ministers "fight to the bitter end" to keep a casino out of Middleborough.

A large number of local clergy, a clinical social worker and a former social worker have expressed grave concerns about the increase in the numbers of those afflicted compulsive gambling if a casino comes to town. I suggest that these are but predictions, which are based on reasonable sounding assumptions, but still based on assumptions.

Such predictions should be cautionary notes. But those who express them aren't infallible fortune tellers. They can't divine how well our educational and professional community, working closely with the Mashpee Wampanoags, will deal with potential problems.

According to the Boston Globe (May 24, 2004) "area religious leaders, joining together to warn of the dangers of gambling, vow to 'fight to the bitter end' to keep a proposed casino out of Middleborough.

While such language is unfortunately bellicose in tone, I believe a spirited "fight" should really be a dialogue, and will be healthy and illuminating as long as both sides stick to the facts. But once the dialogue is over and, assuming as we do, the Mashpee Wampanoag open their resort casino, I know the clergy will join us in letting bygones be bygones.

We know many of the clergy who signed the letter against the casino and view them as dedicated community leaders who will work with all their hearts to assure Middleboro enthusiastically welcomes our oldest residents back home.

Once we have a thriving gaming industry nestled in the Precinct Street woods there will be some attendant untoward social and community consequences. We count on our clergy to minister to their congregations to help them cope with yet another one of those changes that makes 21st century life so perilous.

If we all work together to establish the best possible preventative and treatment programs, we can prove that all the dire predictions about what a casino does to harm the mental health of a community are wrong.  Top

 

It's real. It's serious. But because Middleboro may host a resort that is also a major casino, we should learn the basics about this psychiatric disorder.

What is compulsive gambling?
 

Return to top

free web site counters
Office Depot Online Store